Rejection dating quotes
Therefore, contempt is a response to a perceived failure to meet an interpersonal standard.Contempt is also a particular way of regarding or attending to the object of contempt, and this form of regard has an unpleasant affective element.However, contempt may be experienced as a highly visceral emotion similar to disgust, or as cool disregard. In David Hume's studies of contempt, he suggests that contempt essentially requires apprehending the “bad qualities” of someone “as they really are” while simultaneously making a comparison between this person and ourselves.Because of this reflexive element, contempt also involves what we might term a “positive self-feeling” of the contemptuous.Second, girls may hurt one another via non-verbal expressions of exclusion or disdain because girls and women may gaze at others more for reasons related to their lower social status, so as to learn as much as possible about others’ needs and desires (see La France, 2002, for a discussion of ‘Smile boycotts and other body politics’, p. Because girls and women gaze at others often, perhaps mean glares are more effective as a means of wielding power.
Non-verbal forms of social exclusion may be a highly effective way to harm someone with relatively few social consequences; the hurtful act is fleeting, can often be executed behind the victim’s back and outside of the watchful eyes of adults, and, even if caught, mean faces are typically not punished.
(Hume, 2002, 251) Contempt for a person involves a way of negatively and comparatively regarding or attending to someone who has not fully lived up to an interpersonal standard that the person extending contempt thinks is important.
This form of regard constitutes a psychological withdrawal from the object of contempt.
By feeling contempt for those things which are found to be unethical, immoral, or morally unsavory, one can both show that they are bad and remove them from the moral community.
The main response of contempt lies within “publicized expression of low regard for the objects held in contempt” (Miller, C. By this reasoning, a person holding contempt would not have the urge to openly confront the person with whom they are at odds, nor would they themselves try to remove the object of contempt; rather, one who holds contempt would have the tendency to hold the view that others should remove the object of contempt, or hold the view that the object of contempt should remove itself.